Using Goodreads and Rotten Tomatoes

For many of my comparisons, I used the websites of Goodreads and Rotten Tomatoes to compare the books with the films or tv shows. I wanted to use these websites as they incorporate views of the public and audience as well as professional critics who have expert knowledge in their field. I thought this would be more useful to my project than using a few academic papers or dissertations and taking information from them as they wouldn't be representative sources and would not give a wide range of ideas from across the globe. 

Goodreads is the world's largest sight for books recommendations and its purpose is to give honest reviews to help people find the books that they might enjoy. Therefore, because of the diversity of locations that reviews are published from, and the huge number of ratings each book receives, I thought it would give a representative and reliable sample which was more suited to my debate. 

Rotten Tomatoes is the world's most trusted recommendation source for entertainment. It has different types of ratings, including an audience rating and a critics rating. This was useful for me because I was able to see how each film adaptation was enjoyed by audiences, whilst also evaluating it through the eyes of professional critics. There are critics from many different news agencies around the world, each giving differing opinions which I could contrast and compare in order to form a conclusion for each case study. Once again, it gave me a representative sample rather than just using one person's opinion. 

Since there was no definite answer to my EPQ project, I didn't think it was necessary to find purely academic resources as it wasn't the direction I wanted to go with my research. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Timeline reflection - March 2022

EPQ Plan